Tawakkol Karman blocked from UN Security Council briefing on Yemen after member objections
Yemen Herald News 
The Yemeni activist and Nobel Peace Prize laureate Tawakkol Karman was prevented from addressing a civil society briefing on Yemen at the United Nations Security Council after several member states objected to her taking part. Sandra Jensen Landi, Denmark’s deputy permanent representative to the United Nations, confirmed that Karman had been unable to speak because of what she described as strong opposition within the Council.
Karman is the best-known Yemeni civic figure internationally. She rose to prominence during the protest movement of 2011, when she led sit-ins in Sanaa calling for the removal of President Ali Abdullah Saleh, and she shared the Nobel Peace Prize that year with the Liberian politician Ellen Johnson Sirleaf and the Liberian activist Leymah Gbowee. She had co-founded the press freedom group Women Journalists Without Chains in 2005, and remains among the most widely quoted Yemeni voices in international media.
The objections raised at the Council did not concern that record. According to accounts of the discussion carried by Yemeni outlets, several members disputed her presentation as an independent civil society representative, pointing to her long association with Islah, formally the Yemeni Congregation for Reform, and to what they characterised as advocacy for positions linked to the Muslim Brotherhood. Islah is Yemen’s main Islamist party and a component of the anti-Houthi coalition, and it is treated with hostility by some governments in the region.
Rather than address the chamber, Karman spoke to reporters outside it. In those remarks she said the Houthis bore primary responsibility for what she called the collapse of the Yemeni state. She also apportioned blame more widely, criticising Iran for its backing of the Houthis, Saudi Arabia for the military intervention it launched on behalf of the government the Houthis had ousted, the United Arab Emirates for its involvement in the conflict, and the international community for failing to protect Yemeni civilians.
The Security Council’s monthly Yemen sessions ordinarily pair briefings from the United Nations special envoy and from humanitarian officials with a contribution from a civil society representative, a slot introduced to bring voices from inside the country into a discussion otherwise conducted between diplomats. Which Yemenis fill that slot has become a recurring point of friction, because the choice carries an implicit judgement about who counts as independent in a war with many armed and political factions.
That is the substance of the dispute over Karman. Her supporters regard her as a civic figure with an unbroken record of criticising every armed party in the conflict, including the Houthis and the parties she once campaigned alongside. Her critics regard her as too close to one political current to represent Yemeni civil society as a whole. Neither reading is neutral, and the Council resolved the question in the narrowest possible way, by declining to let the briefing proceed with her in it.
The episode landed at an unusually tense moment. Fighting has resumed across several Yemeni provinces after the truce brokered in April 2022, which had reduced major combat for more than three years. The port of Mokha in Taiz province suspended operations this month after being struck by more than 25 missiles, with material losses put at around 16 million dollars, and the Houthis have claimed two drone attacks on Saudi Aramco’s refinery at Jazan in the space of a week.
Against that background, the Council’s Yemen file has narrowed to security questions: shipping in the Red Sea, the status of the truce, and the risk that the conflict merges with wider regional confrontation. Civil society briefings are among the few points at which the humanitarian and political situation inside the country is raised in the chamber by someone who lives with its consequences, which is why the cancellation of one attracted attention beyond the personalities involved.
Denmark, which holds an elected seat on the Council, has been among the members most engaged on the humanitarian dimension of the Yemen file. Landi’s confirmation was notable mainly because objections of this kind are usually handled quietly, through consultations that never surface publicly. The Council did not issue a formal statement on the decision, and the members who objected were not named in the public account.
For Karman the outcome is not without precedent. She has been a polarising figure inside Yemen for more than a decade, admired by parts of the 2011 protest generation and distrusted by others who associate her with the political settlement that followed. Her international standing has largely insulated her from that argument abroad; the Council’s decision suggests it no longer entirely does.
What the exchange does not resolve is the underlying question of representation. Yemen’s civil society is fragmented across territory controlled by different authorities, and any individual invited to speak in New York can be shown to have a political history somewhere. The alternative to accepting that, as this week demonstrated, is that no Yemeni voice is heard at all.
United Nations efforts to restore the truce have so far produced no publicly announced result. The Council is expected to return to the Yemen file at its next scheduled session, and it is not yet clear whether a different civil society representative will be invited in Karman’s place.
About the Author
