UK condemns Houthi attacks on Saudi Arabia and reaffirms support for Yemen's sovereignty

Spread the Word

The United Kingdom has restated its support for Yemen’s internationally recognised government and for Saudi Arabia in the face of escalating Houthi attacks, in a series of statements issued through July 2026 that London has repeated as fighting along the Red Sea coast has intensified. The Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office condemned the attacks in unusually direct language, describing them as reckless and unacceptable, and tied its position to a broader defence of Yemeni sovereignty.

The clearest expression of that position came at the United Nations Security Council on 13 July, at a session the United Kingdom requested alongside the United States, France and Bahrain. Ambassador Kate Foster, the British Chargé d’Affaires to the UN, told the Council that the United Kingdom condemned in the strongest terms the Houthi attacks against Saudi Arabia carried out that day. She called them reckless and entirely unacceptable, and said they threatened regional security, risked further escalation and undermined efforts to secure peace in Yemen.

Foster added that Britain stood in full solidarity with Saudi Arabia and reaffirmed its support for the kingdom’s security. The intervention reflected London’s standing role as the penholder on Yemen at the Security Council, the member state that drafts and steers Council business on the file, a position that gives British statements on Yemen more weight than their length suggests.

A second and more specific concern raised at the same meeting involved Iran. The United Kingdom said it was deeply concerned by reports that two Iranian aircraft had landed in Yemen, on 3 July and again on 13 July, without permissions or clearances from the relevant Yemeni authorities. Foster described the flights as a clear breach of Yemen’s sovereignty and a violation of international law.

She was careful to qualify what remained unproven. If reports that the aircraft carried military personnel, technical experts and equipment were verified, she said, they would raise serious concerns and might indicate breaches of Security Council resolutions 2216 and 2140, the measures that underpin the arms embargo and the sanctions regime applied to Houthi leaders. Britain urged further examination through UN mechanisms, including the Panel of Experts, and called on all parties to cooperate fully with that work.

Eight days later the Foreign Office returned to the subject. In a statement issued on 21 July, an FCDO spokesperson condemned Houthi threats against Saudi Arabia, including announced plans to impose a maritime blockade. The department said the provocations risked further regional instability, endangered freedom of navigation in the Red Sea and undermined efforts to secure peace in Yemen, and it called on the Houthis to cease their escalatory actions immediately.

The Middle East and North Africa brief at the Foreign Office is held by Stephen Doughty, who took on responsibility for the region, together with Afghanistan, Pakistan and sanctions policy, in a reshuffle in late July 2026. Yemen’s state news agency has reported the department’s recent statements as ministerial remarks; the published texts on the British government’s own website are attributed to an FCDO spokesperson and to the UK mission in New York rather than to the minister personally.

The statements landed in a sharply deteriorating security picture. The Houthis declared a maritime blockade of Saudi Arabia on 20 July and have since claimed attacks on Saudi-linked shipping in the Red Sea as well as strikes inside the kingdom. In the first week of August the group claimed a drone strike on an Aramco refinery at Jizan, and a missile and drone barrage struck the port of al-Mokha on Yemen’s own Red Sea coast, killing several people according to Yemeni government accounts.

Freedom of navigation is the thread running through the British position. The Bab al-Mandab strait, at the southern end of the Red Sea, is one of the world’s most heavily used maritime corridors, and sustained disruption there pushes traffic around the Cape of Good Hope at considerable cost to shippers and insurers. The United Kingdom Maritime Trade Operations centre, which the Royal Navy runs to advise merchant vessels, reported further incidents in the Gulf of Aden in early August.

Behind the immediate escalation sits a conflict now in its second decade. United Nations estimates put the number of Yemenis needing some form of humanitarian assistance at well over 18 million, with more than four million people displaced from their homes. Aid agencies have repeatedly warned about food insecurity and the risk of disease outbreaks in areas where water and health systems have collapsed, and funding appeals for Yemen have fallen short for several years running.

Britain’s diplomatic presence in the country itself remains limited. The British Embassy in Sanaa suspended operations in February 2015 as the security situation deteriorated, and the ambassador and staff now work from Riyadh and Amman. That arrangement has concentrated London’s influence in the Security Council and in aid programming rather than in day-to-day contact on the ground.

The government said it remained committed to working with Council members, regional partners and the Government of Yemen to support de-escalation, uphold Security Council resolutions and advance a durable political settlement. It urged the Houthis to avoid further escalation and to use existing channels of dialogue to address their concerns. Whether those channels remain usable, after a summer in which the fighting has widened to include direct attacks on Saudi territory and on shipping far from Yemen’s coast, is a question London has not yet answered.