Yemen Condemns Iranian Missile Attack on Jordan and Urges Firmer UN Action

Spread the Word

Yemen’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Expatriates has condemned the Iranian ballistic missile attack on the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan, calling it a violation of Jordanian sovereignty and a direct threat to the kingdom’s security and stability. The statement places Yemen’s internationally recognised government firmly alongside Amman at a moment when the confrontation between Iran and the United States has spilled across the territory of several Arab states.

The ministry expressed Yemen’s solidarity with Jordan and said it supported the measures the kingdom takes to protect its territory and its citizens. It praised what it described as the professionalism of the Jordanian Armed Forces in confronting the attack, and warned that allowing Iran and the armed groups aligned with it to act without consequence would encourage further strikes and erode what remains of the region’s diplomatic openings. The ministry called on the international community and the United Nations Security Council to adopt a firmer position towards activity it says is destabilising the region.

Jordanian officials said the country’s air defences intercepted five Iranian missiles aimed at United States forces stationed on Jordanian soil. Reporting on the attack has pointed to Muwaffaq Salti Air Base near Azraq in the north-east of the kingdom, a facility that has long hosted American aircraft and personnel and that was struck in an earlier round of Iranian fire this month in which US service members were killed. Jordan summoned Iran’s ambassador after those earlier strikes and described the attacks in unusually blunt terms.

Yemen was not alone in responding. The United Arab Emirates condemned what it called a renewed hostile attack on Jordan, and Jordan’s foreign ministry has in turn voiced solidarity with Gulf states hit during the same wave of strikes. The pattern reflects a broader alignment among Arab governments that have found themselves hosting, or sitting beside, the infrastructure of a war they are not formally party to.

The attack on Jordan forms part of a sharply escalating exchange. Iran launched retaliatory salvos at American bases in Kuwait, Bahrain and Jordan earlier in July, and the United States has answered with repeated waves of strikes inside Iran. In the most recent round, US forces hit targets on and around Qeshm Island and the port city of Bandar Abbas, as well as sites near Abadan. US Central Command said the operation was aimed at Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps command centres, drone facilities and coastal capabilities. Iranian state media reported civilian deaths on Qeshm, including a young child, in strikes that Tehran says hit a residential area — an account the United States has not confirmed.

For Yemen, the statement is more than a diplomatic courtesy. The government based in Aden has spent more than a decade in a conflict it frames as a confrontation with Iranian influence, and it has consistently sought to position itself within the wider Arab coalition confronting Tehran. That framing has become more pointed since the Houthi movement, which controls Sana’a and much of the Red Sea coastline, declared a naval blockade of Saudi Arabia on 20 July, disrupting oil shipments that had already been rerouted after the closure of the Strait of Hormuz.

Saudi Arabia has since announced an effort to assemble an international coalition to protect Red Sea shipping, and has carried out air strikes on what it describes as Houthi military facilities at the port of Hodeidah. The Houthis, for their part, say their blockade is a response to what they call a long-standing siege of Yemen and will be lifted if Saudi restrictions are lifted. Both sides contest the other’s account, and independent verification inside Yemen remains difficult.

Yemen’s own capacity to influence any of this is limited. Its government controls only part of the country, its institutions are fragmented, and its economy has been hollowed out by years of fighting. The humanitarian toll is severe: the United Nations estimates that more than 22 million people in Yemen will need humanitarian assistance and protection during 2026, including 5.2 million internally displaced people. Some 18.3 million people are acutely food insecure, and more than 2.2 million children under five are acutely malnourished. Cholera has continued to circulate, with tens of thousands of suspected cases recorded across the governorates. Aid agencies have asked for $2.16 billion to reach 12 million people this year, and appeals in recent years have repeatedly closed underfunded.

That gap between rhetorical weight and material capacity is the honest measure of Yemen’s statement. What Sana’a’s rival government in Aden can offer Jordan is recognition and alignment, not assistance. Its interest in condemning the strike is nonetheless real: every widening of the Iran–US confrontation raises the odds that the Red Sea, the Bab al-Mandab strait and Yemen’s own coastline become more dangerous, and that the shipping and aid corridors on which Yemeni civilians depend narrow further.

Whether the international response the ministry called for materialises is another question. The Security Council has been divided on Iran for years, and the current escalation has so far produced condemnations and counter-condemnations rather than any agreed path to de-escalation. For governments in Amman, Aden, Abu Dhabi and Riyadh alike, the immediate priority is defensive: intercepting what is fired, protecting shipping where possible, and hoping the exchange stops short of a wider regional war.