Senegal’s football governing body has announced its intention to challenge the Confederation of African Football’s (CAF) recent decision to strip the nation of its African Cup of Nations (AFCON) title, which has been awarded to Morocco. The Senegalese officials have expressed strong discontent, claiming that the ruling violates the fundamental principles of the sport, particularly the finality of refereeing decisions.
Abdoulaye Fall, president of the Senegalese Football Federation (FSF), described the CAF’s decision as an “administrative robbery” and vowed to pursue both moral and legal avenues to contest the ruling. Senegal’s legal representative, Juan de Dios Crespo Perez, criticized the decision as “crude” and “irrational,” asserting that it undermines the integrity of the game.
The FSF has formally lodged an appeal with the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) against the CAF’s decision. This ruling came after Senegal was deemed to have forfeited the AFCON final match held in Rabat on January 18, following their walk-off in protest of a penalty awarded to Morocco. Despite returning to the pitch and scoring a goal in extra time to win the match 1-0, the CAF’s appeal board overturned the result, leading to the current dispute.
Senegal’s legal team, which includes international lawyers from various countries, has emphasized that the nation still considers itself the rightful champion of Africa. They have called for an expedited process in the CAS, which typically takes several months, to resolve the matter swiftly. The legal representatives argue that the CAF’s decision lacks a proper explanation, further complicating the situation.
As Senegal prepares for a friendly match against Peru in Paris, the FSF has hinted at a potential presentation of the AFCON trophy to fans, indicating their ongoing belief in their championship status. The outcome of the appeal could have significant implications for the future of football governance and the authority of refereeing decisions on the continent.

